Namibia Here I Come!
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:04 PM
I've attached a few shots up here by Christopher Rimmer. I saw an article on him in a South African newspaper and looked him up on the web. He has done quite a bit of shooting in Etosha Pan and his work is just stunning. What worries me through is he seems to be getting awfully close up to the animals as there is an incredible amount of detail in each shot. I'm starting to wonder if the old 200mm is going to cut it. I realize I'm not going to get work of this quality but I'd really like to fill the frame with the animal instead of it being a blob on the horizon. Any thoughts from you guys who have been to Etosha?
(Edited, Matt. Please refer to this important topic about copyright. Thanks.)
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:21 PM
"Return to old watering holes for more than water; friends and dreams are there to meet you." - African proverb.
How to post images in the text.
Want to tag another member in a post? Use @ before their display name, eg @game warden
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:29 PM
Sorry Matt, the shots I posted were online so I assumed the rule of fair use in the public domain would apply. Christopher Rimmer has a public site on Facebook at My link and a website at My link with many examples of his work.
Welcome SeanB: I've had to edit your post, due to uploading the work of another photographer. Matt
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:57 AM
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:29 AM
The herbivores (especially zebra, black faced impala and springbok) are the most relaxed I've yet to come across in Afica - even more so than Ngorongoro Crater. You can literally stop the vehicle next to them and they won't run - even the steenbok seem reluctant to move.
However, at the waterholes there are only certain spots you can park at and, dependent on what waterhole it is, you can be quite a distance from the waters edge. Therefore a 300mm+ is a must. I mainly used a 300mm 2.8 with a 1.4 converter for single animal shots and often this wasn't enough. Incidentally, Etosha Pan itself is usually some way from the road network - you'll be needing a 600mm+ to frame fill any animals out on the pan - but this is unneccesary as they will all be heading to the waterholes anyway.
Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:47 AM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 08:26 AM
So envious of you. It is lovely there and they have dikdik too. What else are you planning on seeing while in Namibia?
trip report here.
There's none so blind as those who will not see.
Posted 16 January 2012 - 10:16 AM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:42 AM
It's certainly dusty when vehicles pass by but at watering holes I didn't find it too bad, not enough to stop me changing lenses. Just be ready to quickly shut the windows when something comes the other way.
The distance to the animals at the watering holes is dictated to by whcih water hole it is and how close the parking section is. some of them are very close. then obviously you need the animals to come to your side.