Jump to content




See all Safaritalk Special Offers

Message to Guests.

Welcome to Safaritalk where we have been talking Safaris and wildlife conservation since 2006. As a guest you're welcome to read through certain areas of the forum, but to access all the facilities and to contribute your experience, ask questions and get involved, you'll need to be a member - so register here: it's quick, free and easy and I look forward to having you as a Safaritalker soon. Matt.


Photo

Nikon D500

nikon D500 buffer

  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 bettel

bettel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 571 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 23 February 2016 - 03:51 PM

I am thinking to change my camera (D7000). Overall I like it, the only thing that drives me nuts is the size of buffer. Normally buffer space ends right when you really really want to continue shooting :). I am not that savvy in photography so I need your advise. Do you think D500 is worth the price asked (it is pretty expensive)? Are there other improvements comparing to D7000 which I will notice (on my amateur level) other than buffer size?


  • Tomas likes this

#2 Gregor

Gregor

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 205 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stockholm, Sweden
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:Wildlife Photographer/Artist

Posted 23 February 2016 - 06:47 PM

It will be a big difference. Buffer size, frames/s, AF, iso-sensitivity, wifi etc. You will notice. I have had a Nikon D7000 and found it useless as a wildlife camera (mostly because the small buffer). Nikon D500 will be fantastic and a real sibling to D5. (Just as D300 was to D3).


  • Tomas likes this

#3 Grasshopper_Club

Grasshopper_Club

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zuerich
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 23 February 2016 - 10:04 PM

I'm also considering the D500, but as a second body (Very happy with my D750). Something which really starts to annoying me is the fact of changing lenses (loss of time and dust issues).
 
I see the advantages also on the 153 AF Points, 10 fps, buffer size and last but not least for me in the APS-C Sensor. I think that's exactly what I need especially for action photographs and for birds. Considering to use my 80-400mm on that one which will offering me an 120-600mm equivalent and a new 300mm Prime for my D750.
 
My Dad has still the D300s, for which he waited until now to be updated and finally the D500 comes through...
 

I think you will be very happy for a long time with a D500...
 
In my opinion I think the D500 will be a real game changer for the DX sensor format as the D750 was for FX.
 
Cheers



#4 Peter Connan

Peter Connan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,966 posts
  • Local time: 09:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gauteng, South Africa
  • Category 1:Resident in Africa/Former resident
  • Category 2:---

Posted 24 February 2016 - 03:58 AM

D500 will be a huge step up from the D7000.

 

But I would wait until it is out for a few months, and then go and test one myself.


Ek oefen skelm.

#5 xelas

xelas

    Order of the Pith

  • Members
  • 2,213 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Slovenia
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 24 February 2016 - 08:29 AM

While D500 is a pro DX body, also D7200 has improved very much in the fps and buffer departments, and once D500 will hit the shelves, there will be time also for D7300 ...

 

Personally, I would go with D7200. Already available, proven, and if a pro type body is not needed, an excellent DX body. And its layout is the same as the one of D7000.



#6 bettel

bettel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 571 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 24 February 2016 - 11:11 AM

@Gregor, @Grasshopper_Club,

 

Thank you! You comments are very useful!

 

 

But I would wait until it is out for a few months, and then go and test one myself.

That it what I am going to do. My next safari is in September so I have little bit of time :)

 

 

While D500 is a pro DX body, also D7200 has improved very much in the fps and buffer departments, and once D500 will hit the shelves, there will be time also for D7300 ...

I am checking here https://photographyl...city-comparison, it seems the difference between D7000 and D7200 (for lossless 14 bit) is only 8, which roughly adds only 1 sec of shooting :(



#7 xelas

xelas

    Order of the Pith

  • Members
  • 2,213 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Slovenia
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 24 February 2016 - 01:25 PM

@bettel

 

You are right. However I am using 12-bit lossless where the difference is 16 photos i.e. 2 sec. As a hobbyist 12-bit is as good as I need. And being a happy user of D7100, you can see from where I am coming  :) .


  • bettel likes this

#8 Photo-Kiboko

Photo-Kiboko

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 29 February 2016 - 06:31 PM

The technical data of the D500 looks very promising.

The performance of the D500 (DX) is not far away from the D5 (FX), which cost about three times more.

I hope, Nikon will not make the D500 "too cheap" and has reduced performance to meet a lower price target.

I hope, Nikon will spend as much computation performance for the AF module and memory buffer size as for the D5.

 

The D500 has a SD and a XQD slot, but no CF slot.

This is a disadvantage for me, because I need different types of cards for different cameras.

I will try to avoid the XQD cards, because of high price.

 

However, I am looking forward to have a D500 in the near future.


Best regards

Bernd

 

Benin, Eritrea, Gabon, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya (2x), Madagascar, Malawi, Morocco, Namibia, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania (3x), Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe


#9 bettel

bettel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 571 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 29 February 2016 - 06:41 PM

You are right. However I am using 12-bit lossless where the difference is 16 photos i.e. 2 sec. As a hobbyist 12-bit is as good as I need. And being a happy user of D7100, you can see from where I am coming  :) .

Well, the average cheetah hunt is around 10-20 seconds. I am still dreaming to photograph the chase properly :). It is my plan for the next 5 years :)

 

 

However, I am looking forward to have a D500 in the near future.

I am looking forward to seeing actual live data reviews on this camera. Hopefully by end of May, it will be well in use by professional reviewers so that we can have more data :)



#10 xelas

xelas

    Order of the Pith

  • Members
  • 2,213 posts
  • Local time: 08:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Slovenia
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 29 February 2016 - 08:54 PM

@bettel

 

Then just switch to JPEG!!



#11 bettel

bettel

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 571 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 29 February 2016 - 09:22 PM

Lol, taking into account how often I miss WB or overall exposure and how often I forgot to switch back to my preferred settings. It will be dangerous :)


  • xelas likes this

#12 Peter Connan

Peter Connan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,966 posts
  • Local time: 09:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gauteng, South Africa
  • Category 1:Resident in Africa/Former resident
  • Category 2:---

Posted 01 March 2016 - 04:04 AM

I will try to avoid the XQD cards, because of high price.


You do realize that because the XQD is by far the fastest you will be compromising your buffer capacity by not using this card?
Ek oefen skelm.

#13 Nicole

Nicole

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Local time: 09:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Brussels
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:Wildlife Photographer/Artist

Posted 02 March 2016 - 01:51 PM

I am also very interested in the D500. After the D300S I have been waiting for the release of a Nikon professional DX camera for wildlife photography which will give me more reach and probably better quality images than adding a teleconverter on a full frame. 



#14 janzin

janzin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:Wildlife Photographer/Artist

Posted 13 March 2016 - 02:53 PM

I've got the D500 on pre-order and I can't wait! I've been waiting for this camera for a long time. To me, there was no question and I pre-ordered the day it was announced. The same AF engine as the D5?? 153 AF points?? 10 fps? That's all I needed to hear. Plus of course the extra reach in terms of MP over my D810 even in cropped (DX) mode.  I only wish it had been available for my recent trip (just returned from India) but I will definitely have it in time for Kenya in the fall.

 

The only things missing, in terms of my hopes for this camera, was built-in GPS and I would have liked 24 MP, but oh well.

 

I will report back when I get some time with it (supposed to be released end of April--in time for spring migration here!)


  • Peter Connan likes this

#15 janzin

janzin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:Wildlife Photographer/Artist

Posted 04 May 2016 - 09:16 PM

Well I've had my D500 for almost a week now; unfortunately for almost all of that time its been raining here! So I have not gotten out to use it much. However I did manage a couple of mornings in the park and so far I'm very, very impressed! I'm especially impressed with the high ISO performance, I can easily shoot up to 3200 without any qualms (and of course much higher with noise reduction.)  I have not had any opportunity to test the AF on fast-moving subjects such as birds in flight but I can say the AF works great in even very dim light, it will lock focus in close to total darkness! And it seems to have the uncanny ability to focus correctly on a small bird or critter behind grasses or branches; it must be due to the high density of AF points (155.)

 

Another thing I really like, which I didn't expect to, is the touch-screen. It makes reviewing images (zooming and scanning) super fast. Of course 10 FPS will be very useful for wildlife, far surpassing my D810.

 

I'm actually considering buying a 2nd one for safari; instead of using it in conjunction with my D810.  We'll see :rolleyes:

 

I am dying to get out for some bird photography; it looks like we may have some clearing here by the weekend.

 

Meantime here's a chipmunk at ISO 3200, no extra noise reduction, NR set in camera to Low.

 

JZ5_0302b.jpg


  • ZaminOz, Gregor, marg and 8 others like this

#16 Atdahl

Atdahl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Local time: 11:37 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tucson, AZ
  • Category 1:Tourist (first-time visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 11 May 2016 - 10:19 PM

@janzin, you're kiling me!  Just when I thought I was happy with the 7100 (Well except for the buffer)...  I just dropped $1400 on the 200-500 lens and now this...


  • janzin and xelas like this

The good man is the friend of all living things - Mahatma Ghandi

 

Main Photo Gear:

Nikon D7100, Nikon D300, Nikkor 200-500mm, Nikkor 70-300mm, Nikkor 16-85

http://www.focusedonnature.com/


#17 janzin

janzin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 559 posts
  • Local time: 03:37 PM
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA
  • Category 1:Tourist (regular visitor)
  • Category 2:Wildlife Photographer/Artist

Posted 12 May 2016 - 12:00 AM

Well you will love the 200-500 too. Certainly some of the improved sharpness (over my old combo) is due to this great lens. But that lens + the D500 is just perfect for wildlife! I'm getting so many more keepers with this combo than I did with my D810 (not that that isn't a great camera, but better suited to landscape than action.) And now we finally have some sun  :D

 

Chestnut-sided Warbler, ISO 2000

 

JZ5_1130a.jpg


  • Peter Connan, bettel, TonyQ and 3 others like this

#18 Atdahl

Atdahl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Local time: 11:37 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tucson, AZ
  • Category 1:Tourist (first-time visitor)
  • Category 2:---

Posted 12 May 2016 - 02:03 AM

Beautiful shot Janet.  I'm happy you like your new gear.  The photos sure look nice.  I am off to Yellowstone soon to test the 200-500 a bit more.  I bet the D500 will be in the back of my mind the whole time... :) .

 

Alan


  • janzin and xelas like this

The good man is the friend of all living things - Mahatma Ghandi

 

Main Photo Gear:

Nikon D7100, Nikon D300, Nikkor 200-500mm, Nikkor 70-300mm, Nikkor 16-85

http://www.focusedonnature.com/


#19 Peter Connan

Peter Connan

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,966 posts
  • Local time: 09:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gauteng, South Africa
  • Category 1:Resident in Africa/Former resident
  • Category 2:---

Posted 12 May 2016 - 04:14 AM

Nice photo @janzin


i see there is a high-ISO comparison between the D810 and D500 on Photographylife, and to be honest the D500 looks slightly better to my eyes.
Apparently the D500 is now within one stop of what is theoretically possible on DX, although I have no idea how that is calculated, but if true then this is about as good as it's going to get.

I actually almost wish I had waited another 9 months!
  • janzin, xelas and Tomas like this
Ek oefen skelm.

#20 Tomas

Tomas

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 135 posts
  • Local time: 10:37 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Iringa Tanzania
  • Category 1:Tour Operator
  • Category 2:Resident in Africa/Former resident

Posted 12 May 2016 - 07:11 AM

I am saving up for a D500 and a Sigma 150-600 sport maybe it will be a Nikon 200-500 instead but the Sigma has got excellent reviews. 
I am selling my house and land next to a golf course in southern Tanzania so I can afford this (o:







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: nikon, D500, buffer


© 2006 - 2016 www.safaritalk.net - Talking Safaris and African Wildlife Conservation since 2006. Passionate about Africa.

Welcome guest to Safaritalk.
Please Register or Login to use the full facilities.